London 2012 Olympics
.





London 2012 Olympics - Home
London 2012 Olympics - Register
London 2012 Olympics FAQ
London 2012 Olympics Members
London Olympics Calendar
London 2012 Olympics Countdown Timer

London Olympics London Olympics London Olympics
Go Back   London 2012 Olympics > LONDON 2012 > London 2012 politics & legacy
London Olympics London Olympics London Olympics

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
london olympics
Olympic stadium will not be white elephant after London 2012 says Lord Coe
London Olympics london olympics london olympics
Old
  (#1)
London 2012 Olympics Enthusiast
 
richard's Avatar
 
Offline
Posts: 10,410
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: United Kingdom


Olympic stadium will not be white elephant after London 2012 says Lord Coe

19th October 2011, 22:44

The London 2012 chairman, Lord Coe, has been forced to reject claims that the Olympic stadium will become a white elephant after the Games, after a deal with West Ham United collapsed.

It was Coe who made the promise to the International Olympic Committee in 2005 that the stadium would have an athletics legacy and he has campaigned passionately for the track to be retained.

But following the collapse of a deal with West Ham and Newham council for the east London club to move in following the Games amid prolonged legal challenges, there have been renewed concerns over the viability of the stadium with an athletics track.

"It was the right decision to cut through the potential for ongoing legal challenge here and, worse than that, ongoing legal challenge that was taxpayer-fuelled," said Coe, appearing before the London Assembly.

"It is very important that we maintain a commitment to an Olympic legacy and to a mix of tenancies in there."

Assembly member John Briggs put it to Coe that there was "a high risk" of the stadium becoming a white elephant if there was not a fundamental rethink of the options.

The Olympic Park Legacy Company and the government have signalled their determination to hold a quick-fire tender process to find a football club prepared to move in on a tenancy basis, with the stadium remaining in public ownership.

The most likely outcome is that the taxpayer will have to foot the bill to convert the 80,000-seat stadium into a 60,000 venue suitable for both football and athletics, with West Ham paying an annual rent and UK Athletics entitled to 21 days use per year.

However, Coe was challenged over whether the stadium would ever be full for athletics meetings. Those fears will deepen if UK Athletics fails in a bid to host the 2017 world championships in London on 11 November.

Coe said that the stadium would be filled for "every session" of the world championships if London is chosen by the International Association of Athletics Federations, but also pointed to the success of domestic meetings. He said the Olympic Stadium would be full for Diamond League meetings, currently held back-to-back over two nights at Crystal Palace.

"If we had a larger venue we would fill that venue. You only have to go to Crystal Palace for any of those Diamond League meetings to know how many people turn up on spec hoping to get tickets," he said.

"London is the only city that stages two of those back-to-back. We not only sell out for every one of those meetings but would also probably be able to sell five times that number of tickets. There is no lack of demand for top-class track and field in this country but clearly sitting alongside the use of the stadium for local events, English schools championships and the plethora of events and other competitions."

Coe said he had been right to campaign for the retention of track and field within a mixed use stadium. "Let's not run away with the idea track and field is a sport that is not supported. It's a popular sport with an extensive network of clubs in this country and is central to broader policy aims of public health. I am a doughty defender of my sport and I think it is the right mix."

Also appearing before the Assembly, the London organising committee chief executive Paul Deighton admitted that its existing budget of £262m for security within venues – the only element provided for by public funds – would not be enough. He said that money would have to be found from contingency funds within the overall public funding package of £9.3bn to pay for extra guards around perimeter fences and within the venues.

Locog is finalising with the Metropolitan police and the Home Office what the final number should be. The original estimate of 10,000 is likely to end up well below the final total, with the use of the armed forces and the territorial army one option under consideration to bridge the gap.


Source
Owen Gibson
Latest US and world news, sport and comment from the Guardian | guardiannews.com | The Guardian


Be part of something special - Please spread the word about our UNOFFICIAL
London 2012 Olympics news forum & remember to bookmark the site if you like it
   
Reply With Quote
london olympics london olympics london olympics
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

London Olympics Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

London Olympics Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Watch out - scammers are looking out to profit from London 2012 and YOUR money richard Security of the London 2012 Olympics 6 25th February 2012 23:59
London 2012 celebrates one year to go richard London 2012 news 0 27th July 2011 08:09
One Year To Go to the London 2012 Festival richard London & the rest of the UK prepares for London 2012 0 21st June 2011 22:01
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Act 2006 richard London 2012 politics & legacy 2 25th January 2008 10:51
New era of stadium design begins with London Olympic Stadium richard London 2012 news 0 7th November 2007 11:24


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
vBulletin Skin developed by vbstyles.com
NOTE: www.the2012londonolympics.com (established 2004) is an UNOFFICIAL London 2012 Olympics forum & NOT affiliated with, or endorsed by London Organising Committee of the Olympic Games (LOCOG), International Olympic Committee (IOC), United States Olympic Committee (USOC), or National Olympic Committee (NOC) of any country - By providing links to other websites, we do not guarantee, approve or endorse the website, information or products. Nor does a link indicate any association with or endorsement by the linked website. Views & information expressed in users' communications & profiles represent the opinions of the users concerned. All rights reserved.

London Olympics